Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition
portes grátis
Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition
Ibn Qu?lubugha's Commentary on The Compendium of Quduri
Al-Azem, Talal
Brill
02/2023
274
Mole
Inglês
9789004544239
15 a 20 dias
1
Descrição não disponível.
CO N T E N T S
Introduction 1
Chapter 1 Authors 23
A The compendium author: Quduri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
B The commentator: Ibn Qu?lubugha . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Chapter 2 History 51
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
B Periodisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Period 1: Foundational '?anafi' opinions (ca. 150-200) . . . 57
Period 2: Formative transmission (ca. 200-300) . . . . . . 58
Period 3: Classical consolidation (ca. 300-400) . . . . . . 60
Period 4: Tarji? (ca. 400-650) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Period 5: Ta??i? (ca. 650-870) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Who are the 'latter-day jurists' (al-muta'akhkhirun)? . . . . 87
C Historical geographical patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
D Periodisation and the typologies of jurists (?abaqat al-fuqaha') 96
Chapter 3 Theory 105
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's introduction to al-Ta??i? wa-al-tarji? . . 108
B Analysis of the topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
2 The procedures of rule-determinacy . . . . . . . . . . 125
3 Judicial discretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
C Arguments for binding precedent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
1 The ethico-religious argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
2 The argument from legal-system consistency . . . . . 139
3 The argument from legal-system coherence . . . . . . 143
4 The argument from strengthened decision-making . . 145
5 The argument from predictability . . . . . . . . . . . 145
viii CO N T E N T S
6 The argument from historical determinism . . . . . . 146
D Historical developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1 Target audiences: muftis and muftis . . . . . . . . . . 149
2 Rule-determination (tarji?) vs. rule-review (ta??i?) . . 150
3 From monist to pluralistic legal systems . . . . . . . . 153
4 Madhhab-law: tradition, system, concurrent jurisdictions 154
E The (lack of) definition of ?ahir al-riwaya . . . . . . . . . . 157
Chapter 4 Practice 163
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's practice of rule-review . . . . . . . . . . 163
B The functional relationships of commentary . . . . . . . . 166
To resolve a juristic dispute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
To clarify a point of ambiguity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
To identify the opinion or the transmission used in the rule formulation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
To further expand upon the passage . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
To identify an editorial problem in the passage itself . . . . 187
C Employed legal rhetorical reasoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
1 Arguments of juristic evidence (dalil) . . . . . . . . . 190
2 Arguments of transmission (riwaya) . . . . . . . . . . 192
3 Arguments of language and logic . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
4 Arguments from revelation and the early Muslim community
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
5 Arguments from scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
6 Justifications from juristic considerations . . . . . . . 202
7 Justifications from context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
8 Justifications from exigencies of change and necessity . 209
9 Justifications of lifting difficulty and facilitating ease . 212
10 Justifications of preceding juristic authority . . . . . . 214
D Operative principles of rule-determination . . . . . . . . . 218
E The degree of congruence between theory and practice . . 229
Conclusion 235
Appendices 243
A The Writings of Quduri 245
B Jurists cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 249
C Works cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 255
CO N T E N T S ix
Works Cited 259
Index 271
Introduction 1
Chapter 1 Authors 23
A The compendium author: Quduri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
B The commentator: Ibn Qu?lubugha . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Chapter 2 History 51
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
B Periodisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Period 1: Foundational '?anafi' opinions (ca. 150-200) . . . 57
Period 2: Formative transmission (ca. 200-300) . . . . . . 58
Period 3: Classical consolidation (ca. 300-400) . . . . . . 60
Period 4: Tarji? (ca. 400-650) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Period 5: Ta??i? (ca. 650-870) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Who are the 'latter-day jurists' (al-muta'akhkhirun)? . . . . 87
C Historical geographical patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
D Periodisation and the typologies of jurists (?abaqat al-fuqaha') 96
Chapter 3 Theory 105
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's introduction to al-Ta??i? wa-al-tarji? . . 108
B Analysis of the topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
2 The procedures of rule-determinacy . . . . . . . . . . 125
3 Judicial discretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
C Arguments for binding precedent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
1 The ethico-religious argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
2 The argument from legal-system consistency . . . . . 139
3 The argument from legal-system coherence . . . . . . 143
4 The argument from strengthened decision-making . . 145
5 The argument from predictability . . . . . . . . . . . 145
viii CO N T E N T S
6 The argument from historical determinism . . . . . . 146
D Historical developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1 Target audiences: muftis and muftis . . . . . . . . . . 149
2 Rule-determination (tarji?) vs. rule-review (ta??i?) . . 150
3 From monist to pluralistic legal systems . . . . . . . . 153
4 Madhhab-law: tradition, system, concurrent jurisdictions 154
E The (lack of) definition of ?ahir al-riwaya . . . . . . . . . . 157
Chapter 4 Practice 163
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's practice of rule-review . . . . . . . . . . 163
B The functional relationships of commentary . . . . . . . . 166
To resolve a juristic dispute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
To clarify a point of ambiguity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
To identify the opinion or the transmission used in the rule formulation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
To further expand upon the passage . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
To identify an editorial problem in the passage itself . . . . 187
C Employed legal rhetorical reasoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
1 Arguments of juristic evidence (dalil) . . . . . . . . . 190
2 Arguments of transmission (riwaya) . . . . . . . . . . 192
3 Arguments of language and logic . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
4 Arguments from revelation and the early Muslim community
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
5 Arguments from scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
6 Justifications from juristic considerations . . . . . . . 202
7 Justifications from context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
8 Justifications from exigencies of change and necessity . 209
9 Justifications of lifting difficulty and facilitating ease . 212
10 Justifications of preceding juristic authority . . . . . . 214
D Operative principles of rule-determination . . . . . . . . . 218
E The degree of congruence between theory and practice . . 229
Conclusion 235
Appendices 243
A The Writings of Quduri 245
B Jurists cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 249
C Works cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 255
CO N T E N T S ix
Works Cited 259
Index 271
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
rules; legal; tradition; precedent; madhhab; ?anafi; mukhta?ar; compendium; shar?; commentaries; Mamluk; culture; scholarly; jurisprudence; history; Islamic; Islam
CO N T E N T S
Introduction 1
Chapter 1 Authors 23
A The compendium author: Quduri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
B The commentator: Ibn Qu?lubugha . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Chapter 2 History 51
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
B Periodisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Period 1: Foundational '?anafi' opinions (ca. 150-200) . . . 57
Period 2: Formative transmission (ca. 200-300) . . . . . . 58
Period 3: Classical consolidation (ca. 300-400) . . . . . . 60
Period 4: Tarji? (ca. 400-650) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Period 5: Ta??i? (ca. 650-870) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Who are the 'latter-day jurists' (al-muta'akhkhirun)? . . . . 87
C Historical geographical patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
D Periodisation and the typologies of jurists (?abaqat al-fuqaha') 96
Chapter 3 Theory 105
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's introduction to al-Ta??i? wa-al-tarji? . . 108
B Analysis of the topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
2 The procedures of rule-determinacy . . . . . . . . . . 125
3 Judicial discretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
C Arguments for binding precedent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
1 The ethico-religious argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
2 The argument from legal-system consistency . . . . . 139
3 The argument from legal-system coherence . . . . . . 143
4 The argument from strengthened decision-making . . 145
5 The argument from predictability . . . . . . . . . . . 145
viii CO N T E N T S
6 The argument from historical determinism . . . . . . 146
D Historical developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1 Target audiences: muftis and muftis . . . . . . . . . . 149
2 Rule-determination (tarji?) vs. rule-review (ta??i?) . . 150
3 From monist to pluralistic legal systems . . . . . . . . 153
4 Madhhab-law: tradition, system, concurrent jurisdictions 154
E The (lack of) definition of ?ahir al-riwaya . . . . . . . . . . 157
Chapter 4 Practice 163
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's practice of rule-review . . . . . . . . . . 163
B The functional relationships of commentary . . . . . . . . 166
To resolve a juristic dispute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
To clarify a point of ambiguity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
To identify the opinion or the transmission used in the rule formulation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
To further expand upon the passage . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
To identify an editorial problem in the passage itself . . . . 187
C Employed legal rhetorical reasoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
1 Arguments of juristic evidence (dalil) . . . . . . . . . 190
2 Arguments of transmission (riwaya) . . . . . . . . . . 192
3 Arguments of language and logic . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
4 Arguments from revelation and the early Muslim community
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
5 Arguments from scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
6 Justifications from juristic considerations . . . . . . . 202
7 Justifications from context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
8 Justifications from exigencies of change and necessity . 209
9 Justifications of lifting difficulty and facilitating ease . 212
10 Justifications of preceding juristic authority . . . . . . 214
D Operative principles of rule-determination . . . . . . . . . 218
E The degree of congruence between theory and practice . . 229
Conclusion 235
Appendices 243
A The Writings of Quduri 245
B Jurists cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 249
C Works cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 255
CO N T E N T S ix
Works Cited 259
Index 271
Introduction 1
Chapter 1 Authors 23
A The compendium author: Quduri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
B The commentator: Ibn Qu?lubugha . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Chapter 2 History 51
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
B Periodisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Period 1: Foundational '?anafi' opinions (ca. 150-200) . . . 57
Period 2: Formative transmission (ca. 200-300) . . . . . . 58
Period 3: Classical consolidation (ca. 300-400) . . . . . . 60
Period 4: Tarji? (ca. 400-650) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Period 5: Ta??i? (ca. 650-870) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Who are the 'latter-day jurists' (al-muta'akhkhirun)? . . . . 87
C Historical geographical patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
D Periodisation and the typologies of jurists (?abaqat al-fuqaha') 96
Chapter 3 Theory 105
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's introduction to al-Ta??i? wa-al-tarji? . . 108
B Analysis of the topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
2 The procedures of rule-determinacy . . . . . . . . . . 125
3 Judicial discretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
C Arguments for binding precedent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
1 The ethico-religious argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
2 The argument from legal-system consistency . . . . . 139
3 The argument from legal-system coherence . . . . . . 143
4 The argument from strengthened decision-making . . 145
5 The argument from predictability . . . . . . . . . . . 145
viii CO N T E N T S
6 The argument from historical determinism . . . . . . 146
D Historical developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1 Target audiences: muftis and muftis . . . . . . . . . . 149
2 Rule-determination (tarji?) vs. rule-review (ta??i?) . . 150
3 From monist to pluralistic legal systems . . . . . . . . 153
4 Madhhab-law: tradition, system, concurrent jurisdictions 154
E The (lack of) definition of ?ahir al-riwaya . . . . . . . . . . 157
Chapter 4 Practice 163
A Ibn Qu?lubugha's practice of rule-review . . . . . . . . . . 163
B The functional relationships of commentary . . . . . . . . 166
To resolve a juristic dispute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
To clarify a point of ambiguity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
To identify the opinion or the transmission used in the rule formulation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
To further expand upon the passage . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
To identify an editorial problem in the passage itself . . . . 187
C Employed legal rhetorical reasoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
1 Arguments of juristic evidence (dalil) . . . . . . . . . 190
2 Arguments of transmission (riwaya) . . . . . . . . . . 192
3 Arguments of language and logic . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
4 Arguments from revelation and the early Muslim community
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
5 Arguments from scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
6 Justifications from juristic considerations . . . . . . . 202
7 Justifications from context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
8 Justifications from exigencies of change and necessity . 209
9 Justifications of lifting difficulty and facilitating ease . 212
10 Justifications of preceding juristic authority . . . . . . 214
D Operative principles of rule-determination . . . . . . . . . 218
E The degree of congruence between theory and practice . . 229
Conclusion 235
Appendices 243
A The Writings of Quduri 245
B Jurists cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 249
C Works cited by Ibn Qu?lubugha 255
CO N T E N T S ix
Works Cited 259
Index 271
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
