Observer Performance Methods for Diagnostic Imaging
Observer Performance Methods for Diagnostic Imaging
Foundations, Modeling, and Applications with R-Based Examples
Chakraborty, Dev P.
Taylor & Francis Ltd
03/2021
542
Mole
Inglês
9780367781637
15 a 20 dias
1088
PART A The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) paradigm
2 The binary paradigm
3 Modeling the binary task
4 The ratings paradigm
5 Empirical AUC
6 Binormal model
7 Sources of variability in AUC
PART B Two significance testing methods for the ROC paradigm
8 Hypothesis testing
9 Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz-Hillis (DBMH) analysis
10 Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis (ORH) analysis
11 Sample size estimation
PART C The free-response ROC (FROC) paradigm
12 The FROC paradigm
13 Empirical operating characteristics possible with FROC data
14 Computation and meanings of empirical FROC FOM-statistics and AUC measures
15 Visual search paradigms
16 The radiological search model (RSM)
17 Predictions of the RSM
18 Analyzing FROC data
19 Fitting RSM to FROC/ROC data and key findings
PART D Selected advanced topics
20 Proper ROC models
21 The bivariate binormal model
22 Evaluating standalone CAD versus radiologists
23 Validating CAD analysis
PART A The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) paradigm
2 The binary paradigm
3 Modeling the binary task
4 The ratings paradigm
5 Empirical AUC
6 Binormal model
7 Sources of variability in AUC
PART B Two significance testing methods for the ROC paradigm
8 Hypothesis testing
9 Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz-Hillis (DBMH) analysis
10 Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis (ORH) analysis
11 Sample size estimation
PART C The free-response ROC (FROC) paradigm
12 The FROC paradigm
13 Empirical operating characteristics possible with FROC data
14 Computation and meanings of empirical FROC FOM-statistics and AUC measures
15 Visual search paradigms
16 The radiological search model (RSM)
17 Predictions of the RSM
18 Analyzing FROC data
19 Fitting RSM to FROC/ROC data and key findings
PART D Selected advanced topics
20 Proper ROC models
21 The bivariate binormal model
22 Evaluating standalone CAD versus radiologists
23 Validating CAD analysis