Lawfare
portes grátis
Lawfare
New Trajectories in Law
Hau, Mark Friis; Pinos, Jaume Castan
Taylor & Francis Ltd
05/2024
122
Mole
9781032267746
Pré-lançamento - envio 15 a 20 dias após a sua edição
Descrição não disponível.
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-a-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-a-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
liberal democracies;state of exception;power;governmental actors;Civil Society;Rule of Law;territorial conflicts;Intergovernmental Organisations;weapons of war;geopolitics;UN;Standing Rock Indian Reservation;Democratic Backsliding;Russian Federation;State Legal Instruments;Central Government;National Security Strategies;Ogoni Case;ICJ;DAPL;Territorial Dispossession;Universal Jurisdiction;Eta Prisoner;Climate Change Litigation;NATO's Operation Ally Force;Fundamental Liberal Rights;Basque Country;Catalan Independence Movement;Catalan Leaders;MOSOP;Internment Policy;Standing Rock;Minority Territorial Groups
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-a-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-a-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
liberal democracies;state of exception;power;governmental actors;Civil Society;Rule of Law;territorial conflicts;Intergovernmental Organisations;weapons of war;geopolitics;UN;Standing Rock Indian Reservation;Democratic Backsliding;Russian Federation;State Legal Instruments;Central Government;National Security Strategies;Ogoni Case;ICJ;DAPL;Territorial Dispossession;Universal Jurisdiction;Eta Prisoner;Climate Change Litigation;NATO's Operation Ally Force;Fundamental Liberal Rights;Basque Country;Catalan Independence Movement;Catalan Leaders;MOSOP;Internment Policy;Standing Rock;Minority Territorial Groups
