Knowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments

Knowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments

Lindholm, Torun; Wikforss, Asa; Stroembaeck, Jesper; Glueer, Kathrin; Oscarsson, Henrik

Taylor & Francis Ltd

05/2022

290

Dura

Inglês

9780367629250

15 a 20 dias

453

Descrição não disponível.
1. Introduction: Toward Understanding Knowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments; 2. What is Knowledge Resistance?; 3. From Low-choice to High-choice Media Environments: Implications for Knowledge Resistance; 4. Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News: Understanding the Supply Side; 5. Selective Exposure and Attention to Attitude-consistent and Attitude-discrepant Information: Reviewing the Evidence; 6. Relevance-Based Knowledge Resistance in Public Conversations; 7. Responsiveness to Evidence: A Political Cognition Approach; 8. Reports of the Death of Expertise May Be Exaggerated: Limits on Knowledge Resistance in Health and Medicine; 9. Is Resistance Futile? Citizen Knowledge, Motivated Reasoning, and Fact-Checking; 10. Uninformed or Misinformed? A Review of the Conceptual-Operational gap Between (Lack of) Knowledge and (Mis)perceptions; 11. Striving for Certainty: Epistemic Motivations and (Un)biased Cognition; 12. Political Polarization Over Factual Beliefs; 13. The Democratic Gold-Standard of Fact-Based Issue Ambivalence; 14. Overcoming Knowledge Resistance: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies
knowledge;information;high-choice environment;low-choice environment;digital media;news media;fake news;internet;anti-vaxx;philosophy;psychology;communication;media;attitudes;populism;misinformation;mis-information;disinformation;dis-information;climate change;climate change denial;conspiracies;conspiracy theories;conspiracy theorists;polarisation;polarization;ideology;ideologies;outgroups;cognition;cognitive ability;fact checking;motivation;patterns of engagement with politics;patterns of engagement with information;high-choice information environments;knowledge resistance;increasing misperceptions;supply of misinformation;contradictory information;phenomena of knowledge resistance;beliefs attitudes knowledge;misinformation and fake news;selective exposure and attention;evidence and fact-checking;political partisanship;political polarization over factual beliefs;counteracting knowledge resistance;philosophy knowledge resistance;psychology knowledge resistance;knowledge resistance media;communication knowledge resistance;political science knowledge resistance;journalism knowledge resistance;understanding knowledge resistance;implications for knowledge resistance;attitude-discrepant Information;responsiveness to evidence;political cognition approach;relevance-based knowledge resistance;knowledge resistance public conversations;death of expertise;knowledge resistance in health and medicine;citizen knowledge motivated reasoning fact-checking;motivated reasoning fact checking;epistemic motivations unbiased cognition;epistemic motivations;unbiased cognition;overcoming knowledge resistance;biased information processing;factual belief polarization;misperceptions and knowledge resistance;epistemic irrationality;motivated reasoning;politically motivated reasoning;fact polarization;epistemically irrational response;selective exposure;contemporary high-choice media environments;high-choice media environments;supply of different types of information;weakening traditional news media;citizens as media consumers;citizens as co-producers of information;citizens as disseminators of information;attitude-consistent information;supply of disinformation;supply of fake news;confirmation bias political polarization;cognitive dissonance political polarization;cognitive dissonance knowledge resistance;confirmation bias knowledge resistance;reinforcement-seeking knowledge resistance;reinforcement-seeking political polarization;credibility perceptions knowledge resistance;online discourse knowledge resistance;resistance to evidence;public conversations information;public conversations knowledge;unstable information environment;information environment;information environments;digital information environments;information environments online;information source assessment;public assessment of information sources;new media information;new media information supply;new media disinformation;new media information environment;social media information;social media information environment;social media information supply;social media disinformation;new media misinformation;social media misinformation;partisan group membership knowledge;partisan group membership descriptive beliefs;threat sensitivity knowledge resistance;threat sensitivity misinformation;rational thinking knowledge resistance;experiential thinking knowledge resistance;experiential thinking knowledge;denying expert authority;rational thinking knowledge;resisting facts;denying facts;misusing facts;misperceiving facts;public knowledge about political topics;public knowledge politics;knowledge resistance democratic societies;knowledge resistance democracy;uninformed people;ideological polarization;affective polarization;factual perceptions of reality;failure to accept available knowledge;opinions on complex political issues;fact-based issue ambivalence;public opinion;public opinion knowledge resistance;experimental studies overcoming knowledge resistance;Thinking Knowledge;High Choice Environment;High Choice Media Environments;Factual Beliefs;Attitude Consistent Information;Vice Versa;Confirmation Bias;Public Common Ground;Public Conversations;Epistemic Motivation;Selective Exposure Studies;Fake News Sites;UK Resident;Reinforcing Spirals Model;Partisan Media;Self-affirmed Participants;Mainstream News Media;Intellectual Humility;Backfire Effect;Swedish Citizens